![]() Specifically, the maximum lift-to-drag ratio for the flying wing with the MH60 airfoil was 33.1, while that for the flying wing with the TL54 airfoil was 32.7. Based on their maximum lift-to-drag ratio, the flying wing UAVs made with MH60 and TL54 airfoils exhibited the best aerodynamic efficiency. Given the maximum range performance (maximum lift /drag ratio), the best aerodynamic efficiency is given by the flying wing UAV with MH60 and TL54 airfoil. For this purpose, comparative analyzes were performed for four different airfoils: MH60, TL54, Eppler 339, and TsAGI 12%. The aim of the study is to investigate how the choice of airfoil affects the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying wing UAV. In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. Improving Performance of Flying Wing Mini-UAV with Propeller Thrust Involved Trimming the Pitching Moment. Experimental investigation into articulated winglet effects on flying wing surface pressure aerodynamics. Gatto, A., Bourdin, P., & Friswell, M.Aerospace Science and Technology, 46, 287-298. Study on longitudinal stability improvement of flying wing aircraft based on synthetic jet flow control. Dihedral influence on lateral–directional dynamic stability on large aspect ratio tailless flying wing aircraft. Song, L., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., & Huang, J.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(2), 201-216. Aerodynamic investigation of twist angle variation based on wing smarting for a flying wing. ![]() Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 63-70. ![]() Application of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization on Advanced Configuration Aircraft. Design of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with a Mass-Actuated Control System (Bachelor's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya). International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 5(4), 261-272. Development of a long endurance mini-uav: Eternity. Bronz, M., Hattenberger, G., & Moschetta, J.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 224(12), 1243-1251. Optimization of planform and cruise conditions of a transport flying wing. Martinez-Val, R., Perez, E., Puertas, J., & Roa, J.In 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (p. A computational study on the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying-wing MAV design. Design and fabrication of a dual rotor-embedded wing vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicle. ![]() In 14th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (p. Planform optimization of a flying wing with a solid homogeneous structure. Science and Technology Development Journal, 19(3), 43-52. An efficient low-speed airfoil design optimization process using multi-fidelity analysis for UAV flying wing. The Limits of Downsizing-A Critical Analysis of the Limits of the Agile Flying Wing MiniUAV. Prisacariu, V., Boşcoianu, C., Circiu, I., & Boşcoianu, M.In 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit (p. A numerical parametric study of high-lift low reynolds number airfoils. Airfoil Selection Procedure, Wind Tunnel Experimentation and Implementation of 6DOF Modeling on a Flying Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 9, 335-345. Aerofoil design for unmanned high-altitude aft-swept flying wings. Airfoil design for light tailless airplanes. In AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit (p. Thin/Cambered/Reflexed Airfoil Development for Micro Air Vechhicle Applications at Reynolds Numbers of 60,000 to 100,000. Çalışma sonucunda TL 54 e MH60 airfoile sahip uçan kanat İHA, maksimum menzil, minimum iniş hızı ve maksimum dayanıklılık performansı açısından Eppler 339 ve TsAGI %12'den daha iyi performans gösterdi. Eğim momenti katsayısı dikkate alındığında TsAGI %12 ile MH60 kanat profilinden yapılan uçan kanat TL 54 ve Eppler 339'a göre daha stabil bir özellik göstermektedir. Eppler 339 ile uçan kanat, TsAGI %12 ile uçan kanada kıyasla negatif hücum açılarında daha avantajlıdır. MH 60 kanat profili ile uçan kanatta maksimum L/D oranı 33,1'dir, bu değer TL 54 kanat profili ile 32.7 uçan kanattır. Maksimum menzil performansı (maksimum kaldırma / sürükleme oranı) göz önüne alındığında, en iyi aerodinamik verimi MH 60 ve TL54 kanat profilinden yapılmış uçan kanatlı İHA vermektedir. Bu amaçla MH 60, TL54, Eppler 339 ve TsAGI %12 kanat profilleri için karşılaştırmalı analizler yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, kanat profili seçiminin uçan kanat İHA'ların aerodinamik özelliklerini nasıl etkilediğini ortaya koymaktır.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |